2/3/2024 0 Comments Cannon bard theory of emotion– Comparison of Key Differences Key Terms Difference Between James Lange and Cannon Bard Theory James Lange’s theory was introduced in the late 1800s, while Cannon-Bard theory was developed in 1927 as a direct response to James-Lange theory. James Lange’s theory and Cannon-Bard’s theory are two theories that explain our emotional and physical reactions to external stimuli. Through meditation and the right attribute, one allows emotions to happen to oneself (it is impossible to prevent this), but one is advised to observe the emotions without necessarily acting on them one achieves some distance and decides what has value and what does not have value.The main difference between James Lange and Cannon Bard theory is that in James Lange’s theory, emotions follow physical reactions, whereas, in Cannon-Bard theory, both emotional and physical reactions originate simultaneously. Buddha Opens in new window, living in India in the 6th century BC, argued for cultivating a certain attitude that decreases the probability of (in Stoic terms) destructive second movements. They viewed emotions as experiences that needed to be reigned in and controlled.Īs Oately (2004) points out, the Stoic idea bears some similarity to Buddhism Opens in new window. In sum, these ancient Greek and Roman philosophers saw emotions, especially strong ones, as potentially dangerous. The Epicureans, first associated with the Greeks philosopher Epicurus, who lived from 341 to 270 BC, held a similar view, believing that people should enjoy simple pleasures, such as good conversation, friendship, food, and wine, but not be indulgent in these pursuits and not follow passion for those things that hold no real value like power and money.Īs Oatley (2004) states, “the Epicureans articulated a view-enjoyment of relationship with friends, of things that are real rather than illusory, simple rather than artificially inflated, possible rather than vanishingly unlikely-that is certainly relevant today” (p. Character, rationality, and kindness are important. Money, power, and excessive sexual gratification are not important. Prior to second movements, we can consider what is important in life. The Stoics believed that to live the good life and be a good person, we need to free ourselves of nearly all desires such as too much desire for money, power, or sexual gratification. In the Stoic view, choosing a reasoned, unemotional response as the second movement is the only appropriate response. This passage, brief though it is, conveys Stoicism well. He tells himself to instead adopt a philosophical and “rational” attitude, which he saw was a constructive approach to interpersonal relations. In this passage, Marcus Aurelius was talking himself out of acting on his emotions, anger Opens in new window in particular, in the event that he would meet with interference, ingratitude, and so forth. Neither can I be angry with my brother or fall foul of him, for he and I were born to work together, like a man’s two hands, feet, or eyelids. But for my part I have long perceived the nature of good and its nobility, the nature of evil and its meanness, and also the nature of the culprit, who is my brother (not in the physical sense but as a fellow creature similarly endowed with reason and a share of the divine).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |